<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thread Safe Functions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.josefsson.org/2009/06/23/thread-safe-functions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.josefsson.org/2009/06/23/thread-safe-functions/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 21:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Javier Serrano Polo</title>
		<link>http://blog.josefsson.org/2009/06/23/thread-safe-functions/comment-page-1/#comment-24984</link>
		<dc:creator>Javier Serrano Polo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 11:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.josefsson.org/?p=104#comment-24984</guid>
		<description>Regarding random(), the informative part of the specification says you shouldn't use it "when an independent random number sequence (...) is required", that means if the behaviour should be reproducible. Operation shall be thread-safe (you won't get the same number because of concurrent calls).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding random(), the informative part of the specification says you shouldn&#8217;t use it &#8220;when an independent random number sequence (&#8230;) is required&#8221;, that means if the behaviour should be reproducible. Operation shall be thread-safe (you won&#8217;t get the same number because of concurrent calls).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
